Charles Gasparino

Business enterprise

By Charles Gasparino

March 18, 2023 | 9:27pm

Charles Gasparino discusses why the US economy wants robust leadership in Washington in the course of a time of many bank collapses.
NurPhoto by way of Getty Pictures

It is a funny but sad spectacle that Joe Biden &amp Co. are attempting to turn the mess at Silicon Valley Bank — and the crisis engulfing the banking technique — into a political win.

Funny mainly because the BS is operating about as properly as their spinning of the transitory nature of inflation, or how properly they handled the alarmingly chaotic pullout from Afghanistan.

Sad mainly because it underscores the downright stupidity of our political class as they face really significant concerns about the banking technique and the economy that can not be spun away.

Of course, the final word has but to be written on the collapse of SVB, Signature Bank, the close to-collapse of 1st Republic Bank, and what ever else implodes by the time this column is in the ­paper.

But one particular point I know for confident is that banking crises demand leadership from Washington — stuff that is so clearly lacking at a time when it is so desperately necessary.

Back in 2008 we had Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson operating day and evening placing out many fires and leveling with Congress and the American persons about the severity of the scenario. Nowadays we have Sleepy Joe Biden, his equally asleep Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announcing that bank bailouts are not actually bailouts mainly because taxpayers are not involved.

Definitely?

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen reportedly mentioned that bank bailouts are not actually bailouts mainly because taxpayers are not involved.AFP by way of Getty Pictures

The government just handed SVB a blank verify to cover all its depositors, primarily lefty Bay Region venture capitalists. That suggests all accounts are covered with FDIC insurance coverage, even these above the limit of $250,000.

He says with a straight face the cash is coming from the major banks who contribute to the FDIC insurance coverage pool. OK, but if the banks are financing the fund, they will pass on these fees to depositors. That suggests everybody with a bank account, which suggests just about each American taxpayer, will be producing entire these wealthy VC dudes.

Duh.

Not really ‘stress’ful

Biden and Yellen then say the watering down of the banking law recognized as Dodd-Frank meant that midsized banks like SVB had been spared the so-known as tension tests that would have uncovered its weaknesses. They seem to ignore (or most most likely have no clue) the dirty small secret that such exams are recognized derisively in banking circles as “feather tests” mainly because even major threat-management-challenged basket instances like Citigroup appear to pass them.

One more whopper: Biden and Yellen want us to think that the San Francisco Fed had no thought what was taking place in its backyard with a bank that grew exponentially in 3 years prior to it sank.

 Again, do not think it. SVB’s CEO was on the board of his neighborhood Fed bank. Everyone who should have recognized what SVB was up to did. And by quite a few accounts they had been also busy producing confident the banks they regulated lived up to ESG requirements and embraced so-known as social-justice treatments to care about SVB’s apparent threat taking. One of my sources worked at SVB till about a year ago, and here’s how he described the bank’s business enterprise model: “Loans to VC-backed businesses that made no cash, asset-primarily based credit lines to PE funds and small else. It should in no way have been given FDIC insurance coverage. This wasn’t a place that created loans to building businesses and took deposits from your aunt.”

Biden mentioned the watering down of Dodd-Frank meant that SVB had been spared the so-known as tension tests that would have uncovered its weaknesses. Bloomberg by way of Getty Pictures

Yes, FDIC insurance coverage was supposed to safeguard smallish depositors like your aunt, not dice-rolling tech millionaires who banked at SVB and knew it was a risky business enterprise. These tech millionaires (like the SF Fed) either knew or need to have known that a hiccup in the economy like increasing prices could doom this bank and perhaps other people.

As I 1st reported final week, the major banks are now freaking out about yet another midsized bank also in San Francisco about to succumb to marketplace forces named 1st Republic. (See a pattern right here?) They chipped in with $30 billion to stabilize the bank at least for the time ­being.

That is mainly because I also hear the bank could be sold in the coming days to one particular of the bailout participants. The explanation they’re undertaking this is not necessarily mainly because they consider 1st Republic is a good business enterprise — rather they’re seriously worried about financial contagion that policy makers have no clue how to deal with.

Bear in mind 2008?

The bill is coming due for the unserious financial policies of the previous two-plus years: The wildly unprecedented spending by the Biden administration to turn the US into a quasi-socialist European welfare state and cash printing by the Fed to make that occur.

Just about every top rated bank executive I speak to says the present troubles in the monetary technique could lead to a thing on the scale of what went down in 2008. They’re also seriously worried the banking tumult is but yet another instance of Sleepy Joe &amp Co. not becoming up for the job.

Or as one particular remarked to me: “Where’s Hank Paulson when you need to have him?”

Load far more…

{{#isDisplay}}

{{/isDisplay}}{{#isAniviewVideo}}

{{/isAniviewVideo}}{{#isSRVideo}}

{{/isSRVideo}}

https://nypost.com/2023/03/18/group-biden-slings-bank-bs-but-you-cant-spin-this-debacle/?utm_supply=url_sitebuttons&amputm_medium=web-site%20buttons&amputm_campaign=web-site%20buttons

Copy the URL to share