On Thursday, 15-seed Princeton guys pulled out a thrilling upset more than No. two Arizona.
The Tigers, who will advance to the Round of 32 on Saturday, are the only group in the men’s tournament without having any players on athletic scholarship. Ivy League schools prohibit sports scholarships and only supply athletes “need-based” monetary help.
As if March couldn’t get any madder, two basketball players filed a lawsuit against Ivy League schools more than this policy just two weeks ago.
- The lawsuit, which is in search of class certification, was filed by existing Brown women’s basketball player Grace Kirk and former men’s player Tamenang Choh.
- The players argued in a complaint that the policy violates the Sherman Antitrust Act by illegally cost-fixing the worth of athletes’ athletic competitors.
- Whilst the suit acknowledges that players obtain monetary help, it normally does not cover the price of attendance — which an athletic scholarship could.
“The Ivy League Agreement, in brief, has stymied competitors that would have lowered, and would reduce, the net price of attendance,” the complaint study. “These injuries are specifically unfair provided what is expected of Ivy League Athletes and how their solutions advantage their schools and the Ivy League brand.”
The complaint also referenced two other current antitrust circumstances connected to college sports, O’Bannon v. NCAA and NCAA v. Alston — which each identified that particular compensation restrictions in the NCAA have been illegal.
“The Ivy League athletics model is constructed upon the foundational principle that student-athletes must be representative of the wider student physique, which includes the chance to obtain need to have-primarily based monetary help,” the Ivy League stated in a statement.