The United States has recently responded to Mexico’s legal arguments against the use of transgenic corn, stating that they are not based on relevant international standards, science, or the T-MEC laws. In a document of over 100 pages, the US side respectfully requested the panel to conclude that Mexico’s barriers to genetically modified corn are incompatible with its commitments to the T-MEC.
Mexico had once been part of the international scientific community that considers genetically modified crops safe for consumption by humans, animals, and plants. However, in February 2023, Mexico announced modifications to its decree, allowing the use of transgenic corn as fodder and food production for animals but maintaining the ban on products for human consumption such as tortillas.
The US argues that Mexico’s approach is vague and imprecise in identifying risks associated with genetically modified corn consumption. Furthermore, Mexico’s alleged measures have commercial effects, citing a significant decrease in white corn exports from the US to Mexico following the implementation of the Corn Act 2023. The US claims that Mexico’s actions constitute arbitrary discrimination between countries and have impacted trade relations between the two nations.
According to Mexico, it has made significant efforts to improve its regulations regarding genetically modified crops while also ensuring food safety for its citizens. The country has implemented measures such as mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods and increased monitoring of imports and exports. However, these measures do not satisfy the US side, which believes they are inconsistent with international standards and should be revised accordingly.
The formal arbitration process is set to return a preliminary verdict in September and a final verdict in November. If Mexico continues with its current approach towards genetically modified crops, it could face further trade consequences from the United States. On the other hand, if Mexico adapts its regulations according to international standards and science-based evidence, it could improve its relationships with other countries while ensuring food safety for its citizens.
In conclusion, while both sides have valid concerns about genetically modified crops regulation, it is essential for them to find a common ground that promotes science-based decision-making while also protecting consumer health and trade relations between nations.